Let’s suppose that a compliance system costs $12,000 annually. Does that sound like a high price?
What it replaces will decide the final answer.
If automating the collection of evidence across a complex technology environment can eliminate hundreds of hours of repetitive work, then $12,000 may be an appropriate amount to spend. If a company of seven could have the same proof in two hours per month, the calculation is quite different.
That’s a useful way to approach the search for a Vanta alternative. Asking which platform has the greatest features is not the only thing to consider. Ask how many hours and time these features could save your business.
The Break-Even Level for Automation
It’s not inherently good or bad. Scale changes its value. Imagine a company in the field of technology that is growing, and has multiple cloud environments, many applications and frequent changes to access. It is possible to manually collect evidence, which could be a major operational burden. Integrations that automate monitoring systems and gather evidence are able to justify their costs.
Consider a startup with 10 employees preparing for their first SOC 2. Its infrastructure may be relatively compact, and the evidence collection might be manageable with extensive automation.
Vanta pricing is based upon this difference. A high-end platform can offer vast capabilities, but these capabilities will only be of value when an organization actually requires they.
Compare Architecture, Not Just Brands
Vanta vs Drata is a discussion that is a simple feature-by-feature test. Both platforms are based around automation and interconnected with each other, which means that companies looking for this type of approach will benefit from looking at the frameworks they support by their integrations, as well as the service along with individual quotations and contracts.
There’s a second decision to take prior to that. Do you want to use a compliance platform that integrates? Certain businesses want constant monitoring as well as automated collection of evidence. Some businesses prefer to collect evidence by themselves.
Vanta Competitors Do not All Use the same model
A number of well-known Vanta rivals have a place in the market, that has a similar focus on automation. The market also includes lightweight platforms that are designed to focus on organizing rather than extensive system connectivity.
CertAssist is part of the latter group. CertAssist was developed by internal auditors, compliance consultants, and other professionals, organizes control frameworks in a central place. It offers editable guidelines and policies for evidence and allows auditors to examine evidence with read-only access.
It deliberately does not connect to operational systems, or install infrastructure agents. Customers choose and upload the proof they wish to provide.
Consideration of System Access in the Making
Removal of integrations has its limitations: one must be able to manually collect evidence.
It also eliminates integration setup and also means that the application does not require standing connections to the operational environment.
The architectures of either are not superior to the other. The important question is which option is most appropriate for your business.
CertAssist targets teams between five and 200 members. The price is disclosed rather than needing the salesperson to obtain the initial price. The starting price is $225 a month, that’s a difference from the normal cost of $375 per month.
Let Complexity take its rightful Place
The requirements for a start-up that a 10 person company has today might differ at 100 or even 500 employees.
The compliance can be maintained using a the help of a basic platform. The costs of automation will rise as the number of employees, systems and frameworks expand. Allow complexity to take the lead when you purchase compliance technology.
Do not purchase fifty different integrations just because they look attractive in the comparison chart. They are worth paying for as the work they replace is more expensive than manually performing them.